Pauls Valley, OK, Pauls Valley Democrat

February 28, 2012

Annual GAO Report Exposes More Duplication in the Federal Budget, Less Responsibility Coming Out of Washington

"The 2012 GAO duplication report reviews 51 areas of government spending..."

U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D.
United States Senate

Washington, D.C. — Members of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs, Chairman Joseph Lieberman (ID-CT), Ranking Member Susan Collins (R-ME), and Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) released the following statements today regarding the second annual Government Accountability Office (GAO) report identifying ongoing duplication and areas for costs savings throughout the federal government. The 2012 GAO duplication report reviews 51 areas of government spending, including 32 areas of extensive federal duplication, fragmentation and overlap, and 19 additional areas of opportunities for large cost savings through addressing waste and mismanagement. Read the full report, titled “Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue”: here.

An amendment introduced by Senator Coburn, approved unanimously in the Senate,[1] and attached to the February 2010 debt limit vote, directed to the GAO to “annually identify federal programs, agencies, offices, and initiatives with duplicative goals and activities, to estimate the cost of such duplication, and to make recommendations to Congress for consolidation and elimination of such duplication.”

“The weak economy and unsupportable debt demand that we identify federal cost savings. This GAO report on duplicative federal programs must guide us in reducing wasteful spending. Its analysis of the government's duplication of efforts says that billions of taxpayer dollars could be saved by streamlining, improving efficiency and strengthening competition. Congress and the administration should get to work now on implementing the best of GAO's recommendations,” said Senator Lieberman.

Senator Collinssaid, “Duplication and overlap serve neither the taxpayers nor the intended beneficiaries of the programs in question.  Just look at the duplicative IT systems government-wide, parallel programs to protect the safety of our food supply from biological attack, and 53 separate, disjointed economic development programs are operating to try to get our economy back on track in some way.  The list goes on.  At a time when our country has an unsustainable debt of $14 trillion, there simply can be no excuse for such waste, duplication, and inefficiencies.”

“At a time when our debt is the greatest threat to our economic and national security, Congress should be doing everything in its power to set common sense priorities.  Eliminating duplicative spending should be the easy part.  This year’s report tells us more about what we already know.  Congress is wasting hundreds of billions of dollars every year because it has created duplicative and fragmented programs, many of which are producing little or no value for taxpayers.  Even worse, Congress has done almost nothing to address problem areas GAO has already identified.   This report shows why Congress has a 9 percent approval rating.  Instead of eliminating duplicative spending, Congress spent the last year finding new ways to borrow money,” said Dr. Coburn.

Key GAO findings and examples of duplication, mismanagement and waste


“This report identifies government duplication, overlap, and fragmentation as well as other cost savings and revenue enhancement opportunities. Its findings involve a wide range of government missions and touch virtually all major federal departments and agencies.”

“Duplication occurs when two or more agencies or programs are engaged in the same activities or provide the same services to the same beneficiaries. In many cases, the existence of unnecessary duplication, overlap, or fragmentation can be difficult to estimate with precision due to a lack of data on programs and activities.”

“We have found that agencies can often realize a range of benefits, such as improved customer service, decreased administrative burdens, and cost savings from addressing the issues we raise in this report.”